dinsdag, april 11, 2006


Muslims feel like the targets of new Dutch tolerance tests

By Tom Hundley; CHICAGO TRIBUNE; ROTTERDAM, Netherlands - The new test for foreigners who want to apply for Dutch residency is very Dutch. It features a DVD that illustrates various aspects of Dutch life, including a topless woman frolicking in the surf and two men kissing warmly. The message couldn't be more explicit: This is who we are; if you don't accept it, don't come.

Although the DVD doesn’t single out any particular group, the intended target of the message is clear. Growing numbers of conservative Muslim immigrants are seen by many Dutch as posing a threat to the Netherlands’ liberal consensus and easygoing lifestyle.

The Dutch are not alone. Britain and Germany are toying with the idea of citizenship tests that would examine cultural values of Muslim immigrants. In the wake of Sept. 11, the attacks in London and Madrid, and the Danish cartoon controversy, Europeans are struggling to come to grips with a widening culture gap between themselves and an increasingly alienated Muslim immigrant community.

For the Netherlands, with a Muslim population of 945,000, the tipping point was the murder of filmmaker Theo van Gogh, shot and stabbed while riding his bicycle along an Amsterdam street in November 2004. The attacker, a Dutch-born Muslim of Moroccan descent, was enraged by a van Gogh film about mistreatment of women in Islamic societies.

The Dutch entrance exam, which became mandatory last month, has been praised by politicians who believe it is a good way of screening out people who are not suited to live in the Netherlands.

“It’s like the warning label on the cigarette packs,” said Marco Pastors, a Rotterdam city councilman whose Leefbaar Rotterdam Party has been labeled anti-Muslim for its support of strict immigration controls. “If you want to live here, you have to accept that girls are allowed to wear miniskirts and can stay out until 3 in the morning. You don’t have to behave this way yourself, but you have to tolerate it.”

Not everyone sees it this way. Mesut Disli, a community activist who came to Rotterdam from Turkey, said that while he accepted the need for an entrance exam, he considered the scenes of the nudity and homosexuality to be gratuitously offensive. “They (the Dutch government) know that, according to Islam, nudity and homosexuality are taboo. They know the feelings of Muslims on this subject. So, indirectly, they are saying that we are not welcome,” he said.

Han Entzinger, a sociologist at Erasmus University Rotterdam and an expert on immigration issues, said the entrance test and other recent measures to curb immigration were “symptoms of panic and anxiety” on the part of the government. He said it also reflected ordinary Dutch citizens’ fear of change.

In addition to the brief scenes of nudity and homosexuality, the 104-minute DVD warns prospective immigrants that the weather in the Netherlands is cold, housing is expensive and the country is flood-prone. It also informs them that honor killing, wife-beating and female circumcision are criminal offenses.

The exam preparation packet and DVD cost about $80. It is available in 14 languages. The fee for taking the exam is $425, which could also discourage some candidates. The test, based on information found on the DVD, will be administered at Dutch embassies. In addition to answering questions about the history and lifestyle of the Netherlands, applicants also will have to demonstrate a basic competence in the Dutch language.

After complaints from Muslim groups, the government produced an “expurgated” version of the DVD—minus the bare breasts and male kissers—for some Islamic countries where possession of pornography is a crime. U.S. citizens and residents of EU countries do not have to take the exam, fueling Muslims’ suspicions that the exam is mainly meant to exclude followers of Islam.

Rotterdam City Council member Leonard Geluk is not enthused about the exam or the attention it has drawn from the international media. “It’s not a correct image of our society,” he said. “We are a tolerant society, and we will stay tolerant. But we also want people from other cultures to understand that when you come here, you are not obliged to sunbathe topless.”

Nearly 40 percent of Rotterdam’s population is foreign-born, and current projections suggest that by 2017, most of its population will not be Dutch-born.

Pastors, the Leefbaar councilman, says the code is a step in the right direction, but that tougher measures will be needed to compel immigrants to integrate. “We used to think: Give people time and they will integrate. It’s a nice theory, but it didn’t work,” he said.

He laid blame on some Muslim leaders who “cultivate the differences between their religious group and others.”

Dutch Muslims say attempts to legislate cultural norms only widen the gap between them and the native Dutch. “The Netherlands has always been known for tolerance, for freedom of religion and respect for human rights,” said Ahmet Akgunduz, rector of the Islamic University of Rotterdam. “Unfortunately, politicians are starting to discuss ways of changing that.”

Karim Khaoiri, a 23-year-old media student, tried to lead a discussion of the subject on a blog that he hosts and found himself under attack by both sides.

The son of Moroccan immigrants, Khaoiri was born in the Netherlands. “Ninety percent of my friends are Dutch; I only speak Dutch; I’m a proud Dutchman,” he said. But as the culture gap widens, he finds himself in a no-man’s-land. “Even when we are born here, we are allochtoon,” said Khaoiri, using the Dutch word for immigrants. “You see it when they look at you: You are not one of us.”




Door RotturdamEchWell op 2006 04 13

Iran wil actie tegen Submission 2

Iran protesteert tegen de film Submission 2 van VVD-Kamerlid Ayaan Hirsi Ali. Het land is het oneens met de manier waarop deze film de islam portretteert, meldt het Iraanse staatspersbureau Irna. De film, die nog in productie is, stelt de positie van homo’s binnen de islam aan de orde. Alle medewerkers aan de film blijven anoniem.

De voorzitter van het Iraanse parlement heeft op een bijeenkomst in Istanbul van parlementsvoorzitters van de landen van de Organisatie van de Islamitische Conferentie -de overkoepelende organisatie van moslimlanden- in een brief opgeroepen te reageren op Submission 2. De film heeft volgens hem een anti-islamitisch thema. Hij spreekt van een nieuwe belediging, na de publicatie van cartoons van de profeet Mohammed in westerse kranten.

Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken Ben Bot (CDA) heeft eerder gezegd dat de Nederlandse regering geen bezwaren heeft tegen een vervolg op Submission. Nederland stelt zich op het standpunt dat de vrijheid van meningsuiting een groot goed is. De consequenties van een productie als Submission zal Nederland wel moeten aanvaarden, zei Bot in februari, nadat de cartoonkwestie voor opschudding had gezorgd in de islamitische wereld.

Eerder maakte Hirsi Ali met regisseur Theo van Gogh de film Submission, die gaat over de positie van vrouwen binnen de islam. De cineast werd vervolgens vermoord door moslimfundamentalist Mohammed Bouyeri, die daarvoor een levenslange celstraf kreeg opgelegd.


Commentaar pagina 1 van 1 paginas